Andrew Sullivan is his mentor and his mentor has gone after Jews and Israel many times, as I note here.
Real Conservatives support Israel and Jews, why is Conor silent on this?
I guess silence means he agrees with Sullivan.
Again, I have bets that he will work for the Obama Administration as a speechwriter after 2010.
In none of his posts anywhere around the net since 1/20/09 has he gone after Obama or Liberals, thus he is not a Conservative.
My question, why does Conor support Anti-semitism?
Update 11/19/ 10:13AM : Sullivan comes through with his hate for Israel again. He wants to give the Pali state rights without responsibilities.
Such as the responsibility of recognizing Israel; The responsibility of not shooting missiles into civilian territory and the responsibility of building a Government that focuses on roads and schools and not Hatred of Jews (but Sullivan shares the same Hate).
And Conor supports Sullivan's permanent attacks on Israel.
Game. Set match.
Conor, either it is wrong or it isn't.
And your silence on Sullivan speaks volumes.
From the the shores of Los Angeles, analysis of Politics and Culture from the Valley of the Shadow!
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
1 comment:
Welcome to the Valley! Please comment about the post and keep to the subject.
There is only one person (JSF) keeping track of comments, so as long as what you write is civil and close to the purpose of the post, you will see it.
Keep this in mind: Politics should not be Personal; then you have a place here.
Write! History will remember your words!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Simple, the very use of the term "Jews" by that name denotes a class of special interests that identify with that label. Liberals pander to special interest groups. Conservatives -- in general, not universally so -- do not. By and large this is a helpful tactic for liberals. Although historically Democrats are historically responsible for the worst abuses against African Americans -- Southern States slavery, the establishment of the KKK, Jim Crow laws, segregation and battling the the Civil Rights Movement ... and yet they have most African Americans in their pocket. Why? Group identity pandering. It's what they do. It is hardly any different from the way they court the Jews, hispanics or numerous other "special interests". Nothing mysterious to it at all.
ReplyDelete